Cross-Complaints and Mutual Restraining Orders Lawyer in Edison and Woodbridge, Middlesex County

Reviewed by William A. Proetta, Esq. · Updated October 2026

New Jersey has no automatic “mutual” restraining order. A Family Part judge can restrain a plaintiff only if the defendant files a separate domestic violence complaint of their own and proves it, and when both people are found to have committed domestic violence, the court enters two final orders on two separate docket numbers, each supported by its own findings under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29.

In Middlesex County, cross-complaints are filed and heard at the Superior Court, Family Part, 120 New Street, New Brunswick, usually before the same judge so the two orders do not conflict. We represent people on both sides of these paired cases from our Edison office, and the decision whether to file a cross-complaint is one we make with a client only after looking hard at the facts.

Why a Judge Cannot Simply Restrain Both People

The Domestic Violence Procedures Manual states that “mutual restraints” cannot be issued on a single restraining order. The court has jurisdiction to restrain a defendant only after a finding, or an admission by that defendant, that they committed an act of domestic violence. A plaintiff who filed the case is not a defendant in it, so nothing in that case can restrain the plaintiff.

If a defendant tells the judge, before or during the final hearing, that the plaintiff also committed domestic violence, the Manual directs that the defendant be told to file a separate complaint. Only if that complaint is granted can restraints run against the original plaintiff.

How Cross-Complaints Move Through the Family Part

At the TRO stage. When both people come to the courthouse and each asks for a TRO against the other, the Manual says the judge should not hear the two complaints together. Each complaint is heard on its own first, with findings placed on the record, and the same judge should consider both so that terms on matters such as the residence and custody of children do not contradict each other. Our page on the temporary restraining order explains the standard for each.

At the final hearing. A cross-complaint filed after the first case receives its own docket number. If practicable, both cases may be heard the same day, and the original plaintiff, now a defendant, may be given an adjournment to prepare a defense. The same two-part test from Silver v. Silver, 387 N.J. Super. 112 (App. Div. 2006), applies to each complaint: a predicate act, and a need for an order to protect that particular plaintiff. Our final restraining order hearing page covers that test in depth.

How a cross-complaint gets heard

Domestic Violence Procedures Manual; Silver v. Silver, 387 N.J. Super. 112 (App. Div. 2006). Family Part, Family Courthouse, 120 New Street, New Brunswick.

1
The defendant says the plaintiff also committed domestic violenceBefore or during the final hearing.
No mutual restraints on one orderA plaintiff who filed the case is not a defendant in it, so nothing in that case can restrain the plaintiff.
File a separate complaintThe defendant is told to file one. A cross-complaint filed later gets its own docket number.
2
TRO stage: each complaint heard on its ownNot heard together; findings placed on the record; the same judge should consider both so terms on the residence and custody of children do not contradict each other.
3
Final hearing: same day if practicableThe original plaintiff, now a defendant, may be given an adjournment to prepare a defense.
4
The Silver test, complaint by complaintA predicate act, and a need for an order to protect that particular plaintiff.
Separate findings, separate results. When both people are found to have committed domestic violence, the court enters two final orders on two separate docket numbers.

A domestic violence complaint is sworn testimony. Filed for leverage, a cross-complaint tends to fail and damages the credibility of the person who filed it.

Possible Outcomes When Both Parties File

Possible outcomes when both parties file

N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 and Silver v. Silver, applied to each complaint separately. Most restrictive first.

OutcomeResult on complaint AResult on complaint BWhat happens
1Both granted
Proven, order needed
Proven, order needed
Two FROs, one on each docketEach party restrained
2One granted
Proven, order needed
Not proven, or no need shown
One FROThe other complaint and its TRO are dismissed
3Findings, no orders
Proven, but no need shown
Proven, but no need shown
Both dismissedDespite findings of a predicate act
4Neither proven
Not proven
Not proven
Both complaints and TROs dismissed

The third row is the one many people miss: a judge may find that both parties committed harassment during a single argument and still decline to enter any order.

The third row is the one many people miss. A judge may find that both parties committed harassment during a single argument and still decline to enter any order, because neither showed a continuing need for protection. Separate findings, separate results.

When a Cross-Complaint Makes Sense, and When It Does Not

A domestic violence complaint is sworn testimony. We advise filing one only when it is true and the client genuinely needs protection. Filed for leverage, a cross-complaint tends to fail and damages the credibility of the person who filed it, sometimes in the very case they were trying to defend.

Situations where a cross-complaint can be appropriate include:

  • Self-defense. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-21(c)(3) says a victim may not be denied relief, arrested or charged under the act because the victim used reasonable force in self-defense against domestic violence by an attacker. A person who was attacked first and was then accused may have a real claim of their own.
  • Ongoing abuse by the other party. Threats, harassing messages or coercive conduct directed at the client, documented by texts, voicemails or witnesses.

It usually does not help to file days later with no new facts, or to allege real but minor conduct, such as one rude text, that will rarely satisfy the second Silver step. For harassment-based claims in particular, see our page on harassment as a restraining order basis.

There is also a trade-off: a person who files must testify and be cross-examined. When criminal charges are pending against that person, their testimony generally cannot be used against them in the criminal case under 2C:25-29(a), except in contempt matters and certain hearsay situations, but the account still becomes part of the record. We decide on a cross-complaint with the criminal case in view.

The Criminal Side of Cross-Allegations

Police who respond to a call where both people report being hurt must try to identify the victim. Under 2C:25-21(c)(2), when both parties show signs of injury, officers consider the comparative extent of the injuries, any history of domestic violence, and other relevant factors. Sometimes both people are charged, often with simple assault or harassment. The restraining order cases and the criminal complaints are separate proceedings; one can be dismissed while the other continues. Our statewide guide to criminal cross-complaints explains how dueling criminal charges are handled.

Cross-Complaints in Middlesex County

Paired cases often begin with a single police call in Edison, Woodbridge or South Plainfield in which each person tells officers the other started it. One party may obtain a TRO that night through a municipal judge, and the other may go to the Family Courthouse at 120 New Street the next weekday to file a complaint of their own. The two dockets are then typically listed before the same Family Part judge, with the first FRO date normally set within about 10 days.

When either case is contested, the trial is commonly scheduled a few weeks after that first date. Both TROs stay in force meanwhile, so neither person may contact the other, even through friends or relatives.

If criminal complaints were also signed, disorderly persons charges are heard in the municipal court of the town where the incident occurred, and indictable charges go to the Criminal Division in New Brunswick, where the MCPO Special Victims Unit prosecutes domestic violence cases in Middlesex. A person held on a complaint-warrant appears at the county’s virtual first appearance, held daily Monday through Saturday at 2:30 p.m.

If one party later wants to withdraw their complaint, Middlesex requires that person to meet with a domestic violence counselor before the judge allows the dismissal. Withdrawing one complaint does not withdraw the other.

Two courts, two cases each

When one police call in Edison, Woodbridge or South Plainfield leads to complaints on both sides, and sometimes both people are charged.

Family Part
Family Courthouse, 120 New Street, New Brunswick
Docket ADocket B
  • Typically listed before the same Family Part judge.
  • First FRO date normally within about 10 days; a contested trial commonly a few weeks after that.
  • Both TROs stay in force meanwhile: no contact, even through friends or relatives.
  • Withdrawing one complaint, after the required meeting with a domestic violence counselor, does not withdraw the other.
Criminal courts
Municipal court or Criminal Division
Charge ACharge B
  • Police try to identify the victim; when both show injury, they weigh comparative injuries, any history and other factors (2C:25-21(c)(2)).
  • Disorderly persons charges: the municipal court of the town where the incident occurred.
  • Indictable charges: the Criminal Division in New Brunswick, prosecuted by the MCPO Special Victims Unit.
  • Held on a complaint-warrant: virtual first appearance, daily Monday through Saturday at 2:30 p.m.
One case can be dismissed while the other continues

How We Approach Paired Cases

  • We sort the evidence by complaint. Each docket has its own allegations, and we prepare a defense to one and, where appropriate, a case on the other.
  • We test the timeline. Who called police, who was injured, and when each complaint was filed often decide credibility.
  • We protect the client in the criminal case. Testimony, statements and plea discussions are coordinated across all proceedings.
  • We avoid conflicting orders. Where both cases go forward, we ask the court for consistent terms on residence, property and parenting time.

For a noncitizen, any finding of domestic violence or later finding that an order was violated may have immigration consequences; consult an immigration attorney before filing or testifying.

Cross-Complaint FAQs

Can a New Jersey judge issue a mutual restraining order?

Not on a single complaint. Each party must file their own complaint, and the judge must find for each one that a predicate act occurred and an order is needed.

Can I file a restraining order against the person who filed one against me?

Yes, if your allegations are true and meet the statute. Your complaint gets its own docket number and its own hearing.

Will both restraining order cases be heard together?

Often on the same day before the same judge, but each complaint is decided separately with its own findings.

Where are cross-complaints heard in Middlesex County?

In the Family Part at the Family Courthouse, 120 New Street, New Brunswick, regardless of whether the incident happened in Edison, Woodbridge or another town.

What if both of us were arrested in Middlesex?

Each criminal case proceeds on its own, in the municipal court or in the Criminal Division, with the MCPO Special Victims Unit handling indictable domestic violence charges, separate from the Family Part restraining order cases.

Is using force in self-defense domestic violence?

Under 2C:25-21(c)(3), a victim who used reasonable force in self-defense against an attacker may not be denied relief, arrested or charged under the act for that reason.

Talk to a Middlesex County Lawyer About Cross-Complaints

Do not file anything, contact the other party, or discuss the incident online until you have advice. Call our Edison office at (732) 659-9600, day or night, or contact us online for a review of both cases.